Friendship Between George and Lennie Essay

In the brisk Of Mice and Men Steinbeck stresses the importance and abnormality of the experience mingled with George and Lennie by using a variety of modes. They are complete opposites, in duration they share a journey by dint of the struggles of The long Depression as friends and claim faith in the comparable dream. This pulls them unneurotic through the most stressful split of the novel. These two itinerant subject areaers meet galore(postnominal) people along their journey, but the cohere mingled with them doesnt weaken. Right from the number genius of the novel, Steinbeck has portrayed the relationship between Lennie and George appears abnormal. Steinbeck put ons talk as a method to say the father and countersign roles between Lennie and George, Look, George, timbre what I done. This suggests that Steinbeck wants to show Lennie as having the mind of a little male child when he says this, you presuppose of when a son would say this to a father number in t his case George in fiat to get some kind of reaction.It is as if Lennie is trying to impress George. This is quite strange, between grown manpower of nigh the same age remembering that Lennie is a to the full grown man, but has the mind of a five year anile. The author uses diachronic context as a method and 3rd person narration to forget new(prenominal) peoples views nearly George and Lennie to be expressed, I never seen one guy take so ofttimes trouble for another guy. This implies, that even physical body one of the first characters that George and Lennie come across, we already get the impression that others animadvert that Lennie and George eat up a weird intimacy and an marvelous bond. A lot of the characters have a tone made to sound suspicious, which I think is purposely written in to the novel be arse Steinbeck. battalion raise it ludicrous because at the time of the Great Depression, no one had friends because e veryone was in competition for the same j obs. The other characters find this and thought that it was strange. John Steinbeck uses description as a method to emphasise the strange nature of the friendly relationship between George and Lennie, bottomland him walked hi opposite, a huge man, uncrystallised of face, with large, pale eyeThis suggests that these two men completely contrast distributively other in looks, as well as state of mind. This makes you wonder why George sticks approximately Lennie, if he is according to the book, a handsome, brisk man. They are opposites in everything, but have it away each other like brothers. George is very fit, healthy and ready to brace anything thrown and twisted at him, whereas Lennie is described as practically more than careless and in a world of his own. This shows contrasting personalities. From the scoop up of the novel, Lennie is shown to be very childlike. John Steinbeck used metaphors as a method to show this, dabbed his cock-a-hoop scrape. A big paw is suggestin g that Lennie has animalistic qualities, whether that is looks or behaviour I think it is both. Because of these animalistic qualities, I think that Lennie is immature and hard to handle.This makes the friendship between Lennie and George seem strange because I think to myself why would George want to stay around Lennie? Even though Lennie could wind George up and test his patience, they stick by each other. Throughout the novel, Steinbeck uses foreshadowing as a method to portray how weird Lennie and Georges friendship is, He aint no good to you, dulcify. foregoing in the story, Candys old dog was conniption dead by Carlson, because they decided that he was of no use to anyone anymore. Candy then told George that it would be more comforting to know that he cranny the dg himself. At the end of the novel, George ginger snap Lennie and he pulled the trigger because he knew that Lennie didnt lease to live anymore and would be better in heaven. George killed Lennie himself because he remembered what Candy told him about the dog. This is a perfect use of the author using correlation. Also, at the start of the novel, they were on the run and if George hadnt shot Lennie, they would have to run again.This shows a orbitual occurrence. Steinbecks idea about this friendship makes me realise that it would be extremely unusual to form a friendship during the Great Depression due to everyone fighting for jobs at the same ranches. However, Lennie and George did not compete, they stuck together and found jobs at the same ranch. Lennie treats George like a father and George needs Lennie as a companion. I think this is why they work so well together it is because they need each other. Their friendship reaches its ultimate test, when George has to opt whether or not to shoot Lennie, as self-sacrifice. However, everything that George does for Lennie is in Lennies best interest. John Steinbeck makes the friendship seem unusual, but dim down, I think that it is really on the nose natural for them to need a companion.